page 65: the screw holes in the frame for mounting the cylinder are symmetrical and centered,
1-1/4 - 7/32 - 13/16 = 7/32.
page 83: fig 14-1: missing dimensions: height of cylinder center relative to frame, height of Tee
center (horizontal steam passages) relative to frame. you can make an educated guess
that the cylinder center is 7/8" down from the top of the frame, but that isn't marked
in the way it should be for that to be certain (the extension line would have to be much
closer to the front bumper to conclude that), the only thing that seems for sure to be 7/8"
is the height of the cylinder valve face relative to the cylinder center. the only height
dimension between parts we have for certain is 9/32 between cylinder center and Tee
"center".
page 84: fig 14-1: section E-E: the Tee "center" seems to be at 21/32 up from the bottom of
the frame (which is 1-1/4 high, or 40/32) so the Tee is 1/32 too high to be "centered"
within the frame. ---> It is asymmetric. <---
page 85: fig 14-3: far right: all the screw holes to the frame on the side of the cylinder are
symmetrical and centered w.r.t. the center of the (5/16 + 25/32 =) 35/32" width
of the mounting surface 35/32 - 9/64 - 13/16 = 9/64.
and the screw holes for the Tee are clearly symmetrical (+/- 15/64 and +/- 9/32),
but they are NOT centered, they are up 9/32 from the center of the cylinder (see
"section A-A") or 19/32 up (5/16 + 9/32) from the edge of the mounting surface.
19/32 up from something that is 35/32 high makes them 3/64 up from being
centered. ---> It is asymmetrical. <---
page 90: fig 14-29: all the screw holes in the Tee are perfectly symmetrical (+/- 9/32 and
+/- 15/64)
but are they centered
? NO !!!!!, see the dimension "11/32" for the height
of the horizontal cross way hole, this would have to be 13/32 to be centered.
it is off by 1/16". ---> It is asymmetrical. <---
If I am correct, we have so far identified three asymmetrical dimensions, one off by 1/32",
one off by 3/64", and one off by 1/16",
I could be wrong, but I am pretty sure such a collection of different error values cannot be
fixed by moving any one single part or by changing any one singe dimension...
In My Humble Opinion this is a design "process" error on Kozo's part.
Gratuitous asymmetry is a big no-no.
If you don't agree with me consider this: look at the 5/16" thickness of the horizontal part of
the Tee, is that 5/16"ths centered around the through holes (steam and exhaust passages)
or is it centered with respect to the 13/16 width of the cylinder mounting face of the far ends
of the Tee
?
There is no way to tell from these drawings, this dimension is missing.!.
(or so it seems to me, hope I'm not fooling myself...)
Page 98: fig 16-1: far lower left: presumably it is the distance from the top of the frame to
the center of the cylinder that is marked as 7/8", at least it is consistent with the 7/8"
noted in "page 83: section A-A", and in this case there doesn't seem to be anything
else that it could be.
OK you CAD'ers, is my analysis of the mismatched offsets from centers correct or am _I_ "offset" ?
what bothers me about this book, in addition to gratuitous asymmetries, and in addition to
gratuitous odd-ball dimensions (32'nds and 64ths of an inch, and #3 screws which almost
don't exist), in addition to the odd-ball dimensioning of locations relative to randomly chosen
other locations rather than to fixed defined reference locations, is that it lacks "xray" drawings,
drawings where parts are shown together and reference lines are defined that parts are measured
relative to. Look at the drawing on pages 2,3,4, it is absolutely beautiful, but it doesn't resolve a
single inconsistency that has come up here (nor elsewhere in the errata if I guess correctly). This
drawing's beauty is deceiving. The boiler is up 5" from the rails, but what about the frame, the
cylinder, the valve, the trunnion plate pivot, ..., ? there aren't all that many critical dimensions
between relative parts in a locomotive, but they are all hidden in this book.
I did my A3 using all my own drawings (because I did it in "F scale") using "xray" drawings first,
and then individual parts detailed second (avoiding all the "gratuitous" errors noted above), and
everything matches up. YMMV.
don't get me wrong, I love this book and I love this engine, its the best out there
and the only one I recommend to new builders, but there is still room for improvement.
Pete Lawrence.